Use that too much and you really don’t sound very with it. These days it is a major part of my vocabulary. The telephone has become an enemy. Conversations can become a minefield. This all really kicked in a year ago August with an incident that sent me to the emergency room.
It has been a bit hard to explain. The fluid in my one ear isn’t right and can cause vertigo and nausea. Fortunately, the worst of it has stopped and just left me a bit unstable at times. I use sight to compensate which seems to have rewired things enough. But with it came some profound hearing loss that remains. I am not looking for sympathy. It is what it is and I can live with it. The reason I am talking about it is that I saw an article which puts into perspective what it is like.
Maria Konnikova writes in The New Yorker that mondegreens are funny but they also give us insight into the underlying nature of linguistic processing, how our minds make meaning out of sound, and how in fractions of seconds, we translate a boundless blur of sound into sense. One of the reasons we often mishear song lyrics is that there’s a lot of noise to get through, and we usually can’t see the musicians’ faces. Other times, the misperceptions come from the nature of the speech itself, for example when someone speaks in an unfamiliar accent or when the usual structure of stresses and inflections changes, as it does in a poem or a song. Another common cause of mondegreens is the oronym*: word strings in which the sounds can be logically divided multiple ways. One version that Steven Pinker describes goes like this: Eugene O’Neill won a Pullet Surprise. The string of phonetic sounds can be plausibly broken up in multiple ways—and if you’re not familiar with the requisite proper noun, you may find yourself making an error. Other times, the culprit is the perception of the sound itself: some letters and letter combinations sound remarkably alike, and we need further cues, whether visual or contextual, to help us out. In a phenomenon known as the McGurk effect, people can be made to hear one consonant when a similar one is being spoken. “There’s a bathroom on the right” standing in for “there’s a bad moon on the rise” is a succession of such similarities adding up to two equally coherent alternatives. Finally along with knowledge, we’re governed by familiarity: we are more likely to select a word or phrase that we’re familiar with, a phenomenon known as Zipf’s law. One of the reasons that “Excuse me while I kiss this guy” substituted for Jimi Hendrix’s “Excuse me while I kiss the sky” remains one of the most widely reported mondegreens of all time can be explained in part by frequency. It’s much more common to hear of people kissing guys than skies.
I guess I can best describe what it is like by saying I am a walking modegreens. I’ve always loved language. I inherited it from my Mom. She corrected the news anchors nightly. I never carried it to the critique level but I do love to play with words.
Music interferes with understanding. Background music in a TV show can drive me up a wall. I added a sound unit with Clear Speak to the TV and that helps some but I always have the captioning on as some voices are really difficult. I really don’t listen to much music any more.
* An oronym is a sequence of words (for example, “ice cream”) that sounds the same as a different sequence of words (“I scream”).
The following is the winning entry in an annual contest at Texas A&M calling for the most appropriate definition of a contemporary term. This year’s term was Political Correctness.
The winner wrote:
“Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which maintains that it is possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.”